Staffordshire University Research and Funding Blog

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Funding
    • New Funds on Research Professional
    • Arts and Creative Technologies
      • Art and Design
      • Film, Sound and Vision
      • Journalism, Humanities and Social Sciences
    • Business, Education and Law
      • Business
      • Education
      • Law
    • Computing, Engineering and Sciences
      • Computing
      • Engineering
      • Sciences
    • Health Sciences
      • Nursing
      • Psychology, Sport and Exercise
      • Social Work and Public Health
  • Tenders
  • News
  • Events
    • Up coming events
    • Events attended
  • Resources
    • Contracts Support
    • Factsheets
    • Find Funding
    • Wider Outlook Newsletter
    • Case Studies
  • Contact Us
    • Meet the Team
    • What can EPT do for you?

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Extracts from the Judgment of Lord Sumption: Public Relations Consultants v Newspaper Licensing Agency

Posted on April 24, 2013 by ck7

CK2304NLAvMeltwaterSupremeCourtJudgment

Please see attached a Note with a few useful extracts from the Judgment of Lord Sumption in Public Relations Consultants v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd [2013] UK SC 18. The point of appeal has been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

More from my site

  • BBSRC Responsive mode research grantsBBSRC Responsive mode research grants
  • Call for proposals: Does human spaceflight affect the perception and uptake of STEM subjects? Call for proposals: Does human spaceflight affect the perception and uptake of STEM subjects?
  • Supreme Court decision in ‘FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners’ – bribes and secret commissions accepted by an agent (as a fiduciary) are held on trust for the principal – an important clarification Supreme Court decision in ‘FHR European Ventures v Cedar Capital Partners’ – bribes and secret commissions accepted by an agent (as a fiduciary) are held on trust for the principal – an important clarification
  • Proprietary rights in payment of bribes and secret commissions coming home?  Perhaps this week. Proprietary rights in payment of bribes and secret commissions coming home? Perhaps this week.
  • Temporary copies (on-screen) and the cached copies: not requiring permission of the copyright holder? The European Court wades in ‘Meltwater’Temporary copies (on-screen) and the cached copies: not requiring permission of the copyright holder? The European Court wades in ‘Meltwater’
  • Costs in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court: Considering conduct of the parties when assessing costs – Access to Justice?Costs in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court: Considering conduct of the parties when assessing costs – Access to Justice?
0.00 avg. rating (0% score) - 0 votes
This entry was posted in Contracts Support and tagged Contract, intellectual property, Science, technology by ck7. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© Staffordshire University 2023

  • Legal
  • Freedom of Information
  • Social Media

Facebook Twitter feed (StaffsUni) YouTube Staffordshire University on Google+

Proudly powered by WordPress
  • CK2304NLAvMeltwaterSupremeCourtJudgment Please see attached a Note with a few useful extracts from the Judgment of Lord Sumption in Public Relations Consultants v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd [2013] UK SC 18. The point of appeal has bee
  • Delicious
  • Pin It
  • Buffer